RSS
The Human Condition
- Death (16) : Mortality & Meaning
- Fallenness (57) : Sin, Evil, Inhumanity
- Meaning of Life (34) : On Who & Why We are
- Sehnsucht (29) : Longing for the Everlasting
- Sex (6) : For passion, for reproduction
- Agency and Will (20) : Free Will or Determinism
"The Dream of a Ridiculous Man," in The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky, trans. David Magarshack (New York: The Modern Library, 1992; first published 1877), 335-6.
But are such repetitions possible in the universe? Can that be nature's
law? And if that is an earth there, is it the same earth as ours? Just
the same poor, unhappy, but dear, dear earth, and beloved forever and
ever? Arousing like our earth the same poignant love for herself even
in the most ungrateful of her children? I kept crying, deeply moved by
an uncontrollable, rapturous love for the dear old earth I had left
behind... Suddenly a strange feeling of some great and sacred jealousy
blazed up in my heart. "How is such a repetition possible and why? I
love, I can only love the earth I've left behind, stained with my blood
when, ungrateful wretch that I am, I extinguished my life by shooting
myself through the heart. But never, never have I ceased to love that
earth, and even on the night I parted from it I loved it perhaps more
poignantly than ever. Is there suffering on this new earth? On our
earth we can truly love only with suffering and through suffering! We
know not how to love otherwise. We know no other love. I want suffering
in order to love. I want and thirst this very minute to kiss, with
tears streaming down my cheeks, the one and only earth I have left
behind. I don't want, I won't accept life on any other!
Mohandas Gandhi on Free Will said...
Gandhi An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments With Truth (Navajivan : 1927-1929)
But from the ordinary point of view, a man who is saved from physically
committing sin is regarded as saved. And I was saved only in that
sense. There are some actions from which an escape is a godsend both
for the man who escapes and for those about him. Man, as soon as he
gets back his consciousness of right, is thankful to the Divine mercy
for the escape. As we know that a man often succumbs to temptation,
however much he say resist it, we also know that Providence often
intercedes and saves him in spite of himself. How all this happens,
how far a man is free and how far a creature of circumstances, how far
free-will comes into play and where fate enters on the scene, all this
is a mystery and will remain a mystery.
Barry Goldwater on Human Nature said...
With No Apologies: Personal and Political Memoirs (Morrow : 1979), 320 pages.
We have conjured up all manner of devils responsible for our present
discontent. It is the unchecked bureaucracy in government, it is the
selfishness of multinational corporate giants, it is the failure of the
schools to teach and the students to learn, it is overpopulation, it is
wasteful extravagance, it is squandering our national resources, it is
racism, it is capitalism, it is our material affluence, or if we want a
convenient foreign devil, we can say it is communism. But when we
scrape away the varnish of wealth, education, class, ethnic origin,
parochial loyalties, we discover that however much we've changed the
shape of man's physical environment, man himself is still sinful,
vain, greedy, ambitious, lustful, self-centered, unrepentant, and
requiring of restraint.
C.S. Lewis on Sehnsucht said...
in The Pilgrim's Regress (1926)
Sehnsucht is "the longing for that unnameable something, the desire
for which pierces us like a rapier at the smell of a bonfire, the sound
of wild ducks flying overhead, the title of, The Well at the World's
End, the opening lines of Kubla Khan, the morning cobwebs in late summer, or the noise of falling waves."
Longfellow on Sadness said...
(1807-1882)
Every man has his own secret sorrows, which the world knows not; and often time we call a man cold when he is only sad.
Fyodor Dostoevsky on Sehnsucht said...
The Dream of a Ridiculous Man, in The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky, trans. David Magarshack (New York: The Modern Library, 1992), 335-6.
I often told them that I had had a presentiment of it years ago and
that all that joy and glory had been perceived by me while I was still
on our earth as a nostalgic yearning, bordering at times on unendurably
poignant sorrow; that I had had a presentiment of them all and of their
glory in the dreams of my heart and in the reveries of my soul; that
often on our earth I could not look at the setting sun without
tears.... That there always was a sharp pang of anguish in my hatred of
the men of our earth; why could I not hate them without loving them
too? why could I not forgive them? And in my love for them, too, there
was a sharp pang of anguish: Why could I not love them without hating
them?
After Death, What? (New York: The Christian Herald, 1908), 81.
Were we to believe that death ends all, that the cessation of the
mortal life terminated the career of being, that the sun of hope was
never to arise above the eternal horizon of tomorrow, the present
existence would be a nightmare of horror, even to those who fall heirs
to the enjoyments of the world, for earth's pleasures are but pain,
earth's riches but dross. Nothing satisfies here; everything cloys and
palls upon the senses. The man of wealth and learning in this respect
is no better off than his poorest neighbor. The latter is often envying
the wealthy, while the rich man is sighing for an indefinable something
to fill up the void in his life, but the void can never be filled by
time; its capacity is the measure of eternity. The ever-constant
longing in the heart of man is a proof that this world is not his home,
that the tomb is not the objective point where the final line is drawn,
beyond which none may go.
Fyodor Dostoevsky on Eden said...
"The Dream of a Ridiculous Man", in The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky, trans. David Magarshack (New York: The Modern Library, 1992 [first published 1877]), 335-6.
Oh, everything was just as it is with us, except that everything seemed to be bathed in the radiance of some public festival and of some great and holy triumph attained at last. The green emerald see lapped the shore and kissed it with manifest, visible, almost conscious love. Tall, beautiful trees stood in all the glory of their green luxuriant foliage, and their innumerable leaves (I am sure of that) welcomed me with their soft, tender rustle and seemed to utter sweet words of love. The lush green grass blazed with bright and fragrant flowers. Birds were flying in flocks through the air and, without being afraid of me, alighted on my shoulders and hands and joyfully beat against me with their sweet fluttering wings. And at last I saw and came to know the people of this blessed earth. They came to me themselves. They surrounded me. They kissed me. Children of the sun, children of their sun — oh, how beautiful they were! Never on our earth had I beheld such beauty in man. Only perhaps in our children during the very first years of their life could one have found a remote, though faint, reflection of this beauty. The eyes of these happy people shone with a bright luster. It was an earth unstained by the Fall, inhabited by people who had not sinned and who lived in the same paradise as that in which, according to the legends of mankind, our first parents lived
before they sinned. These people, laughing happily, thronged round me and overwhelmed me with their caresses; they took me home with them, and each of them was anxious to set my mind at peace.
Utilitarianism (Hackett: 2001, orig. 1861), p. 9.
Now it is an unquestionable fact that those who are equally acquainted
with, and equally capable of appreciating and enjoying, both, do give a
most marked preference to the manner of existence which employs their
higher faculties. Few human creatures would consent to be changed into
any of the lower animals, for a promise of the fullest allowance of a
beast's pleasures; no intelligent human being would consent to be a
fool, no instructed person would be an ignoramus, no person of feeling
and conscience would be selfish and base, even though they should be
persuaded that the fool, the dunce, or the rascal is better satisfied
with his lot than they are with theirs. They would not resign what they
possess more than he, for the most complete satisfaction of all the
desires which they have in common with him. If they ever fancy they
would, it is only in cases of unhappiness so extreme, that to escape
from it they would exchange their lot for almost any other, however
undesirable in their own eyes. A being of higher faculties requires
more to make him happy, is capable probably of more acute suffering,
and certainly accessible to it at more points, than one of an inferior
type; but in spite of these liabilities, he can never really wish to
sink into what he feels to be a lower grade of existence.
"A Free Man's Worship", in Why I Am Not A Christian, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957) 107.
That Man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end
they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears,
his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental
collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of
thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave;
that all the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration,
all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction
in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of
Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a
universe in ruins — all these things, if not quite beyond dispute,
are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can
hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the
firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul's habitation
henceforth be safely built.
Betrand Russell on Human Freedom said...
"A Free Man's Worship", inWhy I Am Not A Christian, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957) 109.
In this lies Man's true freedom: in determination to worship only the
God created by our own love of the good, to respect only the heaven
which inspires the insight of our best moments. In action, in desire,
we must submit perpetually to the tyranny of outside forces; but in
thought, in aspiration, we are free, free from our fellow-men, free
from the petty planet on which our bodies impotently crawl, free even,
while we live, from the tyranny of death. Let us learn, then, that
energy of faith which enables us to live constantly in the vision of
the good; and let us descend, in action, into the world of fact, with
that vision always before us.
"A Free Man's Worship", in Why I Am Not A Christian, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957) 115.
The life of Man is a long march through the night, surrounded by
invisible foes, tortured by weariness and pain, towards a goal that few
can hope to reach, and where none may tarry long. One by one, as they
march, our comrades vanish from our sight, seized by the silent orders
of omnipotent Death. Very brief is the time in which we can help them,
in which their happiness or misery is decided. Be it ours to shed
sunshine on their path, to lighten their sorrows by the balm of
sympathy, to give them the pure joy of a never-tiring affection, to
strengthen failing courage, to instill faith in hours of despair. Let
us not weigh in grudging scales their merits and demerits, but let us
think only of their need — of the sorrows, the difficulties, perhaps
the blindnesses, that make the misery of their lives; let us remember
that they are fellow-sufferers in the same darkness, actors in the same
tragedy as ourselves.
A Free Man's Worship, inWhy I Am Not A Christian, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957) 115-16.
Brief and powerless is Man's life; on him and all his race the slow,
sure doom falls pitiless and dark. Blind to good and evil, reckless of
destruction, omnipotent matter rolls on its relentless way; for Man,
condemned today to lose his dearest, tomorrow himself to pass through
the gate of darkness, it remains only to cherish, ere yet the blow
falls, the lofty thoughts that ennoble his little day; disdaining the
coward terrors of the slave of Fate, to worship at the shrine that his
own hands have built; undismayed by the empire of chance, to preserve a
mind free from the wanton tyranny that rules his outward life; proudly
defiant of the irresistible forces that tolerate, for a moment, his
knowledge and his condemnation, to sustain alone, a weary but
unyielding Atlas, the world that his own ideals have fashioned despite
the trampling march of unconscious power.
"A Free Man's Worship", in Why I Am Not A Christian, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957) 113.
[W]e see, surrounding the narrow raft illumined by the flickering light
of human comradeship, the dark ocean on whose rolling waves we toss for
a brief hour; from the great night without, a chill blast breaks in
upon our refuge; all the loneliness of humanity amid hostile forces is
concentrated upon the individual soul, which must struggle alone, with
what of courage it can command, against the whole weight of a universe
that cares nothing for its hopes and fears. Victory, in this struggle
with the powers of darkness, is the true baptism into the glorious
company of heroes, the true initiation into the overmastering beauty of
human existence. From that awful encounter of the soul with the outer
world, enunciation, wisdom, and charity are born; and with their birth
a new life begins. To take into the inmost shrine of the soul the
irresistible forces whose puppets we seem to be — Death and change, the
irrevocableness of the past, and the powerlessness of Man before the
blind hurry of the universe from vanity to vanity — to feel these things
and know them is to conquer them.
The Plague (New York: Vintage International, 1948, 1975), 37.
When a war breaks out, people say: "It's too stupid; it can't last
long." But though a war may well be "too stupid," that doesn't prevent
its lasting. Stupidity has a knack of getting its way; as we should see
if we were not always so much wrapped in ourselves... In this
respect our townspeople were like everybody else, wrapped up in
themselves; in other words they were humanists: they disbelieved in
pestilences. A pestilence isn't a thing made to man's measure;
therefore we tell ourselves that pestilence is a mere bogy of the mind,
a bad dream that will pass away. But it doesn't always pass away and,
from one bad dream to another, it is men who pass away. Our townsfolk
were not more to blame than others; they forgot to be modest, that was
all, and thought that everything still was possible for them.
The Plague (New York: Vintage International, 1948, 1975), 121.
[A]ll stream out into the open, drug themselves with talking, start
arguing or love-making, and the last glow of sunset the town, freighted
with lovers two by two and loud with voices, drifts like a helmless
ship into the throbbing darkness. In vain a zealous evangelist with a
felt hat and flowing tie threads his way through the crowd, crying
without cease: "God is great and good. Come unto Him." On the contrary,
they all make haste toward some trivial objective that seems of more
immediate interest than God. In the early days, when they thought this
epidemic was much like other epidemics, religion held its ground, But
once these people realized their instant peril, they gave their thought
to pleasure. And all the hideous fears that stamp their faces in the
daytime are transformed in the fiery, dusty nightfall into a sort of
hectic exaltation, an unkempt freedom fevering their blood.
The Plague, (New York: Vintage International, 1948, 1975) 125-8.
I've seen too much of hospitals to relish any idea of collective
punishment. But, as you know, Christians sometimes say that sort of
thing without really thinking it. They're better than they seem.
[Father] Paneloux is a man of learning, a scholar. He hasn't come in
contact with death; that's why he can speak with such assurance of the
truth — with a capital T. Bet every country priest who visits his
parishioners and has to hear a man gasping for breath on his deathbed
thinks as I do. He'd try to relieve human suffering before trying to
point out its excellence. If [I] believed in an all-powerful God [I]
would cease curing the sick and leave that to Him. But no one in the
world believed in a God of that sort; no, not even Paneloux, who
believed that he believed in such a God. And this was proved by the
fact that no one ever threw himself on Providence completely. [S]ince
the order of the world is shaped by death, mightn't it be better for
God if we refuse to believe in Him and struggle with all our might
against death, without raising our eyes toward the heaven where He sits
in silence?
Albert Camus on Suffering said...
The Plague, (New York: Vintage International, 1948, 1975) 224.
His interest quickened when, in a more emphatic tone, the preacher said
that there were some things we could grasp as touching God, and others
we could not. There was not doubt as to the existence of good and evil
and, as a rule, it was easy to see the difference between them. The
difficulty began when we looked into the nature of evil, and among
things evil he included human suffering. Thus we had apparently needful
pain, and apparently needless pain; we had right that a libertine
should be struck down, we see no reason for a child's suffering. And,
truth to tell, nothing was more important on earth than a child's
suffering, the horror it inspires in us, and the reason we must find to
account for it. [H]e might easily have assured them that the child's
sufferings would be compensated for by an eternity of bliss awaiting
him. But how could he give that assurance when, to tell the truth, he
knew nothing about it? For who would dare to assert that eternal
happiness can compensate for a single moment's human suffering? He who
asserted that would not be a true Christian, a follower of the Master
who knew all the pangs of suffering in his body and his soul. No, he,
Father Paneloux, would keep faith with that great symbol of all
suffering, the tortured body on the Cross; he would stand fast, his
back to the wall and face honestly the terrible problem of a child's
agony. And he would boldly say to those who listened to his words
today, "My brother, a time of testing has come for us all. We must
believe everything or deny everything. And who among you, I ask, would
dare to deny everything?"
The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell: 1872-1914, (Boston: Little Brown, 1967), pp. 3-4.
Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my
life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable
pity for the suffering of mankind. These passions, like great winds,
have blown me hither and thither, in a wayward course, over a deep
ocean of anguish, reaching to the very verge of despair... Love
and knowledge, so far as they were possible, led upward toward the
heavens. But always pity brought me back to earth. Echoes of cries of
pain reverberate in my heart. Children in famine, victims tortured by
oppressors, helpless old people a hated burden to their sons, and the
whole world of loneliness, poverty, and pain make a mockery of what
human life should be. I long to alleviate the evil, but I cannot, and I
too suffer.
The Meaning of Evolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), p. 345.
Man is the result of a purposeless and natural process that did not have him in mind.
