RSS
On the Person and Teachings
- Historicity (1) : Verdict of History
- Resurrection (1) : Evidence and Significance
Craig Blomberg of The Da Vinci Code: A Novel. by Dan Brown (Doubleday: 2003) in The Denver Journal: An Online Review of Current Biblical and Theological Studies
The most important word in this entire book is the noun in the subtitle; this is a "novel"-a work of fiction. That is important to remember, especially after the statements on page 1, which move the work slightly into the arena of historical fiction, but only slightly. It is true that there are such organizations as the Priory of Sion and Opus Dei. It is true that the author has worked hard to describe accurately the contemporary European locations, including city layouts, buildings, and artwork, in which the plot is set. The statement that "all descriptions of... documents... in this novel are accurate" is, however, highly inaccurate!
Andrew Martin Fairbairn, chp. IV in Studies in the Life of Christ (Hodder & Stouton: 1908), pp. 308-30.
The cross of Christ, as if it were the glittering eye of God, has in a
most wondrous way held man spell-bound, and made him listen to its
strange story "like a three years' child" who "cannot choose but hear."
Were not the fact so familiar, men would call it miraculous. Had its
action and history been capable of a priori statement, it would have
seemed, even to the most credulous age, the maddest of mad and
unsubstantial dreams. For it is not only that in the immense history of
human experience it stands alone, a fact without a fellow, the most
potent factor of human good, yet with what seems the least inherent
fitness for it, but it even appears to contradict the most certain and
common principles man has deduced from his experience. We do not wonder
at the cross having been a stumbling-block to the Jew and foolishness
to the Greek. We should have wondered much more had it been anything
else.
The Encyclopedia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information, 11th ed., by Hugh Chisholm (1910), pp. 505-8.
The meaning ordinarily attached to the word "cross" is that of a figure composed of two or more lines which intersect, or touch each other transversely. Thus, two pieces of wood, or other material, so placed in juxtaposition to one another, are understood to form a cross. It should be noted, however, that Lipsius and other writers speak of the single upright stake to which criminals were bound as a cross, and to such a stake the name of crux simplex has been applied. The usual conception, however, of a cross is that of a compound figure. Punishment by crucifixion was widely employed in ancient times. It is known to have been used by nations such as those of Assyria, Egypt, Persia, by the Greeks, Carthaginians, Macedonians, and from very early times by the Romans. It has been thought, too, that crucifixion was also used by the Jews themselves, and that there is an allusion to it (Deut. xxi. 22, 23) as a punishment to be inflicted.
