Nancy R. Pearcey and Charles B. Thaxton
The Soul of Science (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1994), p. 157-8.
At the time of the scientific revolution the reliability of human
knowledge was grounded in the belief that God had created humanity in
His image, to reflect His rationality. But the success of the
mathematical approach to science was so intoxicating that Western
intellectuals no longer felt that the need for any external guarantee
of knowledge. They regarded mathematics itself and the axiomatic method
derived from it as an independent means of gaining indubitable,
infallible knowledge. They set human reason up as an autonomous power,
capable of penetrating to ultimate truth. Mathematics, as the crown of
human reason, was essentially worshiped as an idol. ¶ But then
something unexpected happened. With no grounding in divine creation,
human knowledge was cut adrift. If the universe is the product of
blind, mechanistic forces, how do we know it has any intelligible
structure at all? If there is no Designer, how can we be confident
there is a design? If human beings are not created in the image of God,
how can we be sure the design we think we detect is really there? Where
is the guarantee that the concepts in our minds bear any relation to
the world outside?
From DNA to a Designer
+ History and Method

Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Lest they devolve into the infantile comments on display at YouTube and elsewhere, comments require registration and are moderated, not for point of view but for quality. » Register or » Login