RSS
The Goodness of God or The Argument from Evil
The Brothers Karamazov, trans. Constance Garnett (Random House : 1993), pp. 245-246.
A Bulgarian I met lately in Moscow," Ivan went on, seeming not to hear
his brother's words, "told me about the crimes committed by Turks and
Circassians in all parts of Bulgaria through fear of a general rising
of the Slavs. They burn villages, murder, outrage women and children,
they nail their prisoners by the ears to the fences, leave them so till
morning, and in the morning they hang them — all sorts of things you
can't imagine. People talk sometimes of bestial cruelty, but that's a
great injustice and insult to the beasts; a beast can never be so cruel
as a man, so artistically cruel. The tiger only tears and gnaws, that's
all he can do. He would never think of nailing people by the ears, even
if he were able to do it. These Turks took a pleasure in torturing
children, too; cutting the unborn child from the mother's womb, and
tossing babies up in the air and catching them on the points of their
bayonets before their mother's eyes. Doing it before the mother's eyes
was what gave zest to the amusement. Here is another scene that I thought very
interesting. Imagine a trembling mother with her baby in her arms, a
circle of invading Turks around her. They've planned a diversion; they
pet the baby, laugh to make it laugh. They succeed, the baby laughs. At
that moment a Turk points a pistol four inches from the baby's face.
The baby laughs with glee, holds out his little hand to the pistol,
and he pulls the trigger in the baby's face and blows out its brains.
Artistic, wasn't it? By the way, Turks are particularly fond of sweet
things they say.
Philip Yancey on Pain said...
"That Hurts", Books and Culture: A Christian Review (May/June 2008, p. 32)
Theologians blithely attribute pain to the Fall, ignoring the marvelous design features of the pain system. Every square millimeter of the body has a different sensitivity to pain, so that a speck of dirt may cause excruciating pain in the vulnerable eye whereas it would go unreported on the tough extremities. Internal organs such as the bowels and kidneys have no receptors that warn against cutting or burning—dangers they normally do not face — but show exquisite sensitivity to distention. When organs such as the heart detect danger but lack receptors, they borrow other pain cells ("referred pain"), which is why heart attack victims often report pain in the shoulder or arm. The pain system automatically ramps up hypersensitivity to protect an injured part (explaining why a sore thumb always seems in the way) and turns down the volume in the face of emergencies (soldiers often report no pain from a wound in the course of battle, only afterwards). Pain serves us subliminally as well: sensors make us blink several times a minute to lubricate our eyes and shift our legs and buttocks to prevent pressure sores. Pain is the most effective language the body can use to draw attention to something important.
The Brothers Karamazov, Constance Black Garnett, trans. (Modern Library: 1977), p. 254.
There was in those days a general of aristocratic connections, the owner of great estates, one of those men — somewhat exceptional, I believe, even then — who, retiring from the service into a life of leisure, are convinced that they’ve earned absolute power over the lives of their subjects. There were such men then. So our general, settled on his property of two thousand souls, lives in pomp, and domineers over his poor neighbours as though they were dependents and buffoons. He has kennels of hundreds of hounds and nearly a hundred dog-boys — all mounted, and in uniform. One day a serf-boy, a little child of eight, threw a stone in play and hurt the paw of the general’s favourite hound. ‘Why is my favourite dog lame?’ He is told that the boy threw a stone that hurt the dog’s paw. ‘So you did it.’ The general looked the child up and down. ‘Take him.’ He was taken — taken from his mother and kept shut up all night. Early that morning the general comes out on horseback, with the hounds, his dependents, dog-boys, and huntsmen, all mounted around him in full hunting parade. The servants are summoned for their edification, and in front of them all stands the mother of the child. The child is brought from the lock-up. It’s a gloomy, cold, foggy, autumn day, a capital day for hunting. The general orders the child to be undressed; the child is stripped naked. He shivers, numb with terror, not daring to cry.... ‘Make him run,’ commands the general. ‘Run! run!’ shout the dog-boys. The boy runs.... ‘At him!’ yells the general, and he sets the whole pack of hounds on the child. The hounds catch him, and tear him to pieces before his mother’s eyes!... I believe the general was afterwards declared incapable of administering his estates. Well — what did he deserve? To be shot? To be shot for the satisfaction of our moral feelings? Speak, Alyosha!
"The Dream of a Ridiculous Man," in The Best Short Stories of Dostoevsky, trans. David Magarshack (New York: The Modern Library, 1992; first published 1877), 335-6.
But are such repetitions possible in the universe? Can that be nature's
law? And if that is an earth there, is it the same earth as ours? Just
the same poor, unhappy, but dear, dear earth, and beloved forever and
ever? Arousing like our earth the same poignant love for herself even
in the most ungrateful of her children? I kept crying, deeply moved by
an uncontrollable, rapturous love for the dear old earth I had left
behind... Suddenly a strange feeling of some great and sacred jealousy
blazed up in my heart. "How is such a repetition possible and why? I
love, I can only love the earth I've left behind, stained with my blood
when, ungrateful wretch that I am, I extinguished my life by shooting
myself through the heart. But never, never have I ceased to love that
earth, and even on the night I parted from it I loved it perhaps more
poignantly than ever. Is there suffering on this new earth? On our
earth we can truly love only with suffering and through suffering! We
know not how to love otherwise. We know no other love. I want suffering
in order to love. I want and thirst this very minute to kiss, with
tears streaming down my cheeks, the one and only earth I have left
behind. I don't want, I won't accept life on any other!
David Hume on Evil and Suffering said...
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Bobbs-Merril Co, Inc : 1970), pt. X, pp. 84-85. The "great poet" is John Milton, the quotation from Paradise Lost, bk. XI.
But though these external insults, said Demia, from animals, from men, from all the elements, which assault us form a frightful catalogue of woes, they are nothing in comparison of those which arise within ourselves, from the distempered condition of our mind and body. How many lie under the lingering torment of diseases? Hear the pathetic enumeration of the great poet.
The Plague, (New York: Vintage International, 1948, 1975) 125-8.
I've seen too much of hospitals to relish any idea of collective
punishment. But, as you know, Christians sometimes say that sort of
thing without really thinking it. They're better than they seem.
[Father] Paneloux is a man of learning, a scholar. He hasn't come in
contact with death; that's why he can speak with such assurance of the
truth — with a capital T. Bet every country priest who visits his
parishioners and has to hear a man gasping for breath on his deathbed
thinks as I do. He'd try to relieve human suffering before trying to
point out its excellence. If [I] believed in an all-powerful God [I]
would cease curing the sick and leave that to Him. But no one in the
world believed in a God of that sort; no, not even Paneloux, who
believed that he believed in such a God. And this was proved by the
fact that no one ever threw himself on Providence completely. [S]ince
the order of the world is shaped by death, mightn't it be better for
God if we refuse to believe in Him and struggle with all our might
against death, without raising our eyes toward the heaven where He sits
in silence?
The Plague, (New York: Vintage International, 1948, 1975) 95-7.
Thus from the dawn of recorded history the scourge of God has humbled
the proud of heart and laid low those who hardened themselves against
Him. Ponder this well, my friends, and fall on your knees. If today the
plague is in your midst, that is because the hour has struck for taking
thought. The just man need have no fear, but the evildoer has good
cause to tremble. For plague is the flail of God and the world His
threshing-floor, and implacably He will thresh out His harvest until
the wheat is separated from the chaff. There will be more chaff than
wheat, few chosen of the many called. Yet this calamity was not willed
by God. Too long this world of ours has connived at evil, too long has
it counted on the divine mercy, on God's forgiveness. Repentance was
enough, men thought; nothing was forbidden. You fondly imagine it was
enough to visit God on Sundays, and thus you make free of your
weekdays, You believed some brief formalities, some bendings of the
knee, would recompense Him well enough for your criminal indifference.
But God is not mocked. These brief encounters could not sate the fierce
hunger of His love... To some the sermon simply brough home the fact
that they had been sentenced, for an unkown crime, to an indeterminate
period of punishment.
River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (Basic Books: 1995), p. 133.
The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousand of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease. It must be so... In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.
In saying, therefore, that things are not good according to any standard of goodness, but simply by the will of God, it seems to me that one destroys, without realizing it, all the love of God and all his glory; for why praise him for what he has done, if he would be equally praiseworthy in doing the contrary? Where will be his justice and his wisdom if he has only a certain despotic power, if arbitrary will takes the place of reasonableness, and if in accord with the definition of tyrants, justice consists in that which is pleasing to the most powerful?
The Divine Conspiracy (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1998), p. 61.
Jesus' good news about the kingdom can be an effective guide for our lives only if we share his view of the world in which we live. To his eyes this is a God-bathed and God-permeated world. It is a world filled with a glorious reality, where every component is within the range of God's direct knowledge and control — though he obviously permits some of it, for good reasons, to be for a while otherwise than as he wishes. It is a world that is inconceivably beautiful and good because of God and because God is always in it. It is a world in which God is continually at play and over which he constantly rejoices. Until our thoughts of God have found every visible thing and event glorious with his presence, the word of Jesus has not yet fully seized us.
